Introduction to New Zealand site - case study
In this section of the DSS, a currently operating
timber treatment facility has been used to summarise and illustrate the
critical features of the ERA process. Although the site is an operating
industrial facility, it is located within a rural setting, with
significant sensitive ecosystems and residences in the vicinity.
Therefore the potential for adverse environmental effects resulting from
contaminant discharges to land and water needs to be fully assessed.
The site characterisation component is based on the Site
Characterisation Checklist. A series of picture files (below)
illustrate the site layout, the location of the surrounding potentially
sensitive surface water bodies, neighbouring properties and their
landuses, site soil characteristics and residual and discharge
contaminant levels.
Additional information is provided to characterise
potential exposure pathways, including surface runoff and discharge
characteristics, aquifer permeability, and groundwater direction and
discharge rates.
Preliminary risk characterisation of the New Zealand
site allows evaluation of the residual soil contamination levels and
discharge quality against appropriate acceptance criteria for aquatic
ecosystem protection standards and other relevant environmental
criteria.
Example Documentation � New Zealand Site
Refer Site Characterisation
Checklist: Sections 1 and 2.
Note: Click on the thumbnails for a larger image
Site Location |
|
Aerial photo |
- Record surrounding potentially sensitive
surface water bodies � Lake Waikare, Waikato River, streams,
drains etc.
- Comment on likely/potential ecological sensitivity using existing
information eg. Classifications/rules in Regional Plan, Ecological
assessments, other existing publications. Other resources include
aerial photographs and topographical maps, landuse maps etc.
- Neighbouring properties and landuses e.g. dairy, industrial,
horticultural.
- Note distances to relevant receiving water bodies e.g. the Waikato
River is located approximately 250 m west of the site, Lake Waikare
is located approximately 2 km to the northeast of the site, and a
drain passes adjacent to west and north boundaries of site.
- Is water quality information available for receiving waters? From
Regional Council databases or other sources. Check Regional Plan for
sensitivity of receiving waters, and water quality management
standard for water body.
- Is macro-invertebrate data available?
An example of macro-invertebrate survey data
shows an assessment of the quality of species in the drain adjacent
to the site, and indicates that species diversity is low; the drain
is already a modified channel that collects discharge from
agricultural land as well as the industrial activities in and around
the site.
Possible Contaminants
Refer Checklist: Section 3
Site Activity areas
Determine land use history, assess site plans, identify site
activity areas, including treatment, storage and disposal areas
Consult present and former site occupiers, regional and district
council staff etc
XYZ is a currently operating timber processing site (and formerly a
rural "greenfields" site)
For XYZ site, likely contaminants may therefore include: Copper,
chromium, arsenic (CCA), boron, petroleum hydrocarbons (fuel storage
areas etc.) possibly pentachlorophenol (former treatment activities)
Potential exposure pathways for contaminated soil
Refer Checklist: Section 4
Refer to soil contamination information shown on
surfaceplan.
Review surface characteristics including presence/absence of
impervious surfaces, paving, roofed areas
Determine from plans (or preferably from walkover site assessment)
nature of surface slopes, and discharge points/areas for potentially
contaminated surface runoff
Is discharge to surface water via groundwater a potential exposure
pathway? Wind-blown contaminated dust?
Document distances from potential contaminant sources to receptors.
Surface soil type, geology
Refer Checklist: Section 4
Refer to soil contamination information shown on Soilprofile
Review soil and geological maps � describe soil type, depth of
profile etc.
Describe any exposures � are low-permeability layers present
Soil Contamination Characterisation
Refer to soil contamination information shown on
soildata
Review soil contamination data (if available)
Describe nature, extent (lateral and depth) and magnitude of soil
contamination
Document total and leachable (e.g. TCLP) contaminant concentrations
Annotate on site plans, showing proximity to surface water
receptors.
Solute Transport - Attenuation mechanisms
Leaching of Contaminants in Soils
A chemical can be transported through soil or sediment by solvents
(in water if the chemical is water soluble). If the chemical adsorbs to soil or
sediment, it can be transported when the soil or sediment moves. Any
chemical that leaches can contaminate groundwater.
Leaching Test
A leaching test may be used instead of the soil/water partition
equation. The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) test
(EPA Method 1311) is commonly used in New Zealand to provide a
conservative estimate of the potential for contaminants to leach to
groundwater.
For the site: The range of total concentration results compared with the TCLP
results is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Total and TCLP concentrations
results
Contaminant |
Total |
TCLP |
Arsenic |
7 � 1,300 |
<0.1 � 0.3 |
Chromium (total) |
5.9 � 1,590 |
<0.1 - <0.1 |
Copper |
2.8 � 906 |
<0.1 � 1.0 |
An appropriate dilution factor (based on specific groundwater
conditions) may then be applied representing the dilution available
within the aquifer.
Soil/Water Partition Equations
The leaching modelling methodology presented in MfE (1999, Appendix
4E) presents a useful method to determine the potential for a
contaminant in soil to leach through the soil profile provided that
appropriate data is available. The soil/water partition equation (USEPA,
1996 page 29) relates concentrations of contaminants absorbed to soil
organic carbon to soil contaminant concentrations in the zone of
contamination.
Groundwater Contamination Characterisation
Refer to groundwater contamination information shown on
map.
- Review geological data, borehole information (if available) �
nature of aquifer materials? Hydraulic conductivity data available?
- Depth to groundwater? Seasonal variability (if available)
- Review groundwater contamination data (if available)
- Describe nature, extent and magnitude of groundwater contamination
- Document whether total, soluble or acid soluble contaminant
concentrations
- Annotate on site plans for ease of reference.
Groundwater Flow Characterisation
Refer to groundwater flow information shown on map.
- Piezometric contour plans available?
- Describe groundwater flow characteristics (if information
available) � including groundwater flow direction, hydraulic
gradient
For the site:
- Groundwater flow is to the northwest.
- Hydraulic gradient = dh/hl = 1/340 = 0.003.
If adequate data are available, relatively simple calculations of
contaminant mass loading in groundwater discharging to surface water can
be made to asses the potential for adverse environmental effects in the
surface water body (for consideration of effective mixing of
contaminants).
To determine the volume of contaminated groundwater discharging to
surface water:
Aquifer Throughflow
To estimate the total volume of groundwater flowing through the
aquifer (and subsequently estimate mass loading of contaminants in
groundwater) the following equation may be used:
Q = K.b.(dH/dL).W
Where:
Q = discharge [L3/T]
K = hydraulic conductivity [L/T]
b = aquifer thickness[L]
W = aquifer width [L]
dH/dL = hydraulic gradient [L/L]
In case of site assume:
k = 5 x 10-5
b = 3 m
w = 210 m (width of site)
Therefore Q = 5 x 10-5 x 3 x 0.003 x 210
= 9.45 x 10-5 m3/sec
Groundwater Velocity
Advective transport is the transport of solutes by the bulk movement
of groundwater. Advection is the most important process driving
dissolved contaminant migration in the subsurface. If information is
available regarding the permeability and porosity of the aquifer, and
the hydraulic gradient, an estimate of the groundwater velocity can be
made. The linear groundwater velocity in the direction parallel to
ground-water flow caused by advection is given by:
vx = (K/ne).(dH/dL)
Where:
vx = average linear velocity [L/T]
K = hydraulic conductivity [L/T]
ne = effective porosity [L3/L3]
dH/dL = hydraulic gradient [L/L]
In the case of site:
vx = 5 x 10-5/0.35 x 0.003
= 4.3 x 10-7 m/sec
Therefore if we take a contaminant at the treatment plant and
determine how long it takes to get to the downgradient boundary (MW6)
160 m away from the plant then:
Time (x) = 160/4.3 x 10-7/86400 (seconds in a day)
= 4306 days or 12 years
Comparison with receiving water standards
Finally the contaminant concentrations being discharged to surface
water via groundwater can be compared to appropriate receiving water
standards.
Considerations:
- Allowance for reasonable mixing;
- Consideration should also be given to the quality of stormwater
discharging from the site (including suspended solid
concentrations); and
- Establishment of the appropriate acceptance criteria for the
receiving waters (see below).
Table
2 Reference MfE/MoH and ANZECC (1992) Guideline values
Parameter |
Soil Guideline Value (mg/kg) Industrial Unpaved |
ANZECC (1992) Aquatic Ecosystem Guideline Value
(mg/L) |
Stock Watering Guideline Value (mg/L) |
Irrigation Guideline Value (mg/L) |
Arsenic |
500 |
0.05 |
0.5 |
0.1(2) |
Boron |
NL |
- |
5 |
0.5(3) |
Chromium (III) |
NL |
- |
- |
- |
Chromium (IV) |
360 |
0.01 |
1 |
- |
Total Chromium |
- |
0.01 |
1 |
0.1 |
Copper |
NL |
0.002 - 0.005 |
0.5(1) |
0.2(3) |
Notes:
NL Indicates consideration not limited
- Based on sheep � higher values may be tolerable for other
livestock
- Based on acid, sandy soils � higher values may be tolerable
under other conditions
- Based on sensitive crops - higher values may be acceptable
depending on the crop
As an initial conservative assessment, the maximum soil TCLP
concentrations, and stormwater discharge concentrations, may be compared
to the appropriate receiving water acceptance criteria, after accounting
for dilution effects. |