| Home | About Our Site | Introductory Risk Assessment | Advanced Risk Assessment | Search | Contact Us |

New Zealand ecotoxicity data for soil invertebrates

Ecotoxicity testing protocols 

Ecotoxicity results

Soil micro-organisms

Soil invertebrates

Plants

Freshwater invertebrates

Freshwater fish

Contaminant mobility

Soil property data

Models

Toxicity databases

RA methodologies

Document resources

 

Problem Identification

Receptor Characterisation

Exposure Assessment

Toxicity Assessment

Risk Characterisation

Liability and use of this information - Please read

Copper

Test organism

Test concentrations mg/kga

End point

NOEC

LOEC

EC50 or LC50

Earthworm

Aporrectodea caliginosa

 

 

 

Cu (II)

{0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600}

14 day growth

(adult)

< 100

100

99

[78,127]

28 day growth

(adult)

100

200

114

[72,181]

Cu (II)

{0, 150, 200, 250, 300}

14 day growth

(juvenile)

< 150

150

125

[104,151]

28 day growth

(juvenile)

< 150

150

127

[106,154]

Woodlice

Porcellio scaber

 

 

 

Cu (II)

{0, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2400}

14 day growth

(juvenile)

2400

>2400

No effect up to 2400 mg/kg

28 day growth

(juvenile)

2400

>2400

No effect up to 2400 mg/kg

Cu (II)

{0, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2400}

14 day mortality

(juvenile)

2400

>2400

No effect up to 2400 mg/kg

28 day mortality

(juvenile)

2400

>2400

No effect up to 2400 mg/kg

a Nominal test concentrations in mg/kg are given inside { }

NOEC and LOEC were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post hoc Dunnett’s test at a significance level of p < 0.05. To fit assumption of normality for an ANOVA, percentage data was arcsin transformed, square root or natural log transformations were applied to other data where appropriate, prior to analysis.

LC50 values were derived from probit analysis, 95% confidence intervals are given in [ ].

EC50 values and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated by fitting logistical models to the data using non-linear regression.  Where necessary, weighted regression was performed to allow for heteroscedasticity in the data.

Chromium

Test organism

Test concentrations mg/kga

End point

NOEC

LOEC

EC50 or LC50

Earthworm

Aporrectodea caliginosa

Cr (VI)

{0, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400}

14 day growth

(adult)

<150

150

**

 

Cr (VI)

{0, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400}

28 day growth

(adult)

<150

150

**

 

Cr (VI)

{0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400}

14 day growth

(juvenile)

<50

50

**

 

Cr (VI)

{0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400}

28 day growth

(juvenile)

<50

50

101

[17, 587]

Woodlice

Porcellio scaber

Cr (IV)

{0, 300, 400, 500, 600}

14 day growth

(juvenile)

600

>600

No effect up to 600 mg/kg

 

Cr (IV)

{0, 300, 400, 500, 600}

28 day growth

(juvenile)

600

>600

No effect up to 600 mg/kg

 

Cr (IV)

{0, 300, 400, 500, 600}

14 day mortality

(juvenile)

400

500

544

[481-693]

 

Cr (IV)

{0, 300, 400, 500, 600}

28 day mortality

(juvenile)

300

400

428

[386-472]

a Nominal test concentrations in mg/kg are given inside { }

NOEC and LOEC were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post hoc Dunnett’s test at a significance level of p < 0.05. To fit assumption of normality for an ANOVA, percentage data was arcsin transformed, square root or natural log transformations were applied to other data where appropriate, prior to analysis.

LC50 values were derived from probit analysis, 95% confidence intervals are given in [ ].

EC50 values and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated by fitting logistical models to the data using non-linear regression.  Where necessary, weighted regression was performed to allow for heteroscedasticity in the data.

** EC50 not derived where toxicity curve was incomplete or did not follow a dose-response relationship.

Arsenic

Test organism

Test concentrations mg/kga

End point

NOEC

LOEC

EC50 or LC50

Earthworm

Aporrectodea caliginosa

As (V)

{0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400}

14 day growth

(adult)

50

100

58

[47,71]

 

As (V)

{0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400}

28 day growth

(adult)

50

100

45

[20,102

 

As (V)

{0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100}

14 day growth

(juvenile)

40

60 **

 

As (V)

{0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100}

28 day growth

(juvenile)

40

60 **

 

As (V)

{0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600}

14 day mortality

 (juvenile)

400

600

552

 

As (V)

{0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600}

28 day mortality

 (juvenile)

200

300

522

Woodlice

Porcellio scaber

As (V)

{0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400}

14 day growth

(juvenile)

400

>400

No effect up to 400 mg/kg

 

As (V)

{0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400}

28 day growth

(juvenile)

400

>400

No effect up to 400 mg/kg

 

As (V)

{0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400}

14 day mortality

(juvenile)

200

300

207

[152, 285]

 

As (V)

{0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400}

28 day mortality

(juvenile)

200

300

241

[186, 282]

a Nominal test concentrations in mg/kg are given inside { }

NOEC and LOEC were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post hoc Dunnett’s test at a significance level of p < 0.05. To fit assumption of normality for an ANOVA, percentage data was arcsin transformed, square root or natural log transformations were applied to other data where appropriate, prior to analysis.

LC50 values were derived from probit analysis, 95% confidence intervals are given in [ ].

EC50 values and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated by fitting logistical models to the data using non-linear regression.  Where necessary, weighted regression was performed to allow for heteroscedasticity in the data.

** EC50 not derived where toxicity curve was incomplete or did not follow a dose-response relationship.

Copyright

This WWW site and its contents are copyright to the project participants and may be copied for personal, non-profit or educational purposes provided that the source is acknowledged. The information must not be used for resource management or any commercial purposes without prior written consent from the relevant project participants organisations.

| Home | About Our Site | Introductory Risk Assessment | Advanced Risk Assessment | Search | Contact Us | Disclaimer

Page last updated: 01 May 2007

Copyright © 1998 - 2003 Project Participants & their Organisations